So here’s something I find odd….
On Amazon.com I keep another blog running. The entries there are almost entirely related to ULBG or at least to something related to LEGO in general. (As opposed to this blog where I will sometimes post about non-book or non-LEGO related topics.) And so I find it odd that my last blog posting on Amazon ended up getting two negative votes. Well, that is to say that “0 of 2 voters liked this post". Read another way, “2 voters didn’t like this post.”
Now, let’s suppose for a moment that the posting had been completely self-serving. Suppose it had been for no other purpose except to promote my book. And to be honest… some of the postings are just that. They are nothing but self-promotion.
But the posting in question isn’t one of those. It’s a very simple posting about the most recent issue of BrickJournal that got released. “But wait, don’t you write for BrickJournal?” Yes, I can hear you asking that right now. True, in the past I have written articles and created instructions for the magazine but for the last two issues I’ve done nothing but copy editing. (Actually, that’s been more work than writing articles, but that’s another story.)
So by posting a note about the most recent issue of BrickJournal all I was doing was trying to promote the magazine and the contents that it offers, for FREE, to anyone who might be interested. Doing so doesn’t help me in any way to sell any books. So it strikes me as odd that anyone could justify labelling that posting as not useful.
But, of course, this is the net and what one person can do one one site can be equalled out on another. So now you’ve read my counter statement to those people who didn’t like the posting. As much as I believe people should express themselves, I’m left to ponder… how exactly do you not like something free AND related to LEGO? Ya gotta wonder.
And now you know my side of the story. 
Allan B.